Image courtesy of zimmer.com |
Most everything else I tend to drift towards moderate/easy for the first set or so then increase from there, so why with motion do I almost always start towards the most that my client can actively/comfortably attain? Furthermore, even if I justified having them move through that much range with an easy load for the sake of warming up the tissue or practicing the motion, why do I almost always continue to have them explore that entire range once a greater resistance force is applied? The irony is that the presented challenge in terms of resistance is usually only a challenge during a small part of the range, so how much challenge to the muscular tissue is actually being accomplished by moving through the rest of it?
I can certainly see viable reasons for moving through most of the available active range of a joint during specific exercises with specific individuals, but I'm not sure that it makes sense for me to keep seeing this as option A. Instead, I think it is time to drop this piece that has been somewhat automatic up to this point and start to see not just the motion that is being performed, but the specific part of the motion that is performed, as a variable that needs to be strategically chosen and manipulated, as well.
Do you tend to default to moving through "full range" on your curls, squats, presses, pulls, etc, etc, etc? Do you tend to default to maxing out on weight every rep, too?
Your body. Your training.
Want to use this article in your blog, newsletter, or other platform? You may, but be sure to include all of the biographical information found in the yellow box below!
No comments:
Post a Comment